Audit the BoM

Kenskingdom demonstrates again the wisdom of ‘trust, but verify’:

I compared the adjusted [Australian Temperature] data with the raw data of these 34 stations.

Here are the results, and they are perplexing.

* I was expecting to find a stronger warming trend in the urban data than the 100 non-urban sites. WRONG.
* I was expecting to find BOM correcting for UHI, that is, reducing the trend. PARTLY RIGHT. But less often than with the non-urban sites.
* I was expecting the urban sites to have much better quality of data, with long records, few gaps, and good overlaps if stations’ data had to be combined. WRONG.

Fed up with c**p government science yet?

See JoNova for more.


0 thoughts on “Audit the BoM

  1. Pingback: best term life insurance

  2. Pingback: wypozyczalnia lawet

  3. Pingback: organizacja eventów kulinarnych

  4. Pingback: witryna www

  5. Pingback: new music

  6. Pingback: strona

  7. Pingback: witryna firmowa

  8. Pingback: jak zalozyc sklep w Internecie

  9. Pingback: filmowanie Lublin

  10. Pingback: montaz sufitów mineralnych

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s